WEST HAM are facing the prospect of a multi-million pound compensation pay-out after Alan Curbishley won his claim against the club for constructive dismissal.

A Premier League manager’s arbitration tribunal has upheld Curbishley’s claim after he resigned at the start of last season following the sale of Anton Ferdinand and George McCartney to Sunderland against his wishes.

The tribunal will now assess the level of compensation West Ham must pay – a similar case brought by Kevin Keegan against Newcastle for constructive dismissal saw the Magpies pay £2m in damages plus £1.5m in legal costs.

Curbishley, 51, said he had had no option but to walk out in September last year after nearly two years in charge of the Hammers.

He said: ‘‘I am obviously delighted with this result. I very much enjoyed my time at West Ham and never wanted to leave, but on joining the club I insisted that my contract contained a clause confirming that I would have final say on the selection of players to be transferred to and from the club.

‘‘The club completely ignored my contract when selling Anton Ferdinand, and when George McCartney was then sold, the club having given me assurances that no players would be leaving the club after the sale of Anton Ferdinand, I had no alternative but to resign.

‘‘My authority and integrity were undermined and my position was made untenable.

I now wish to put this entire matter behind me.’’ Curbishley launched a claim for wrongful dismissal after which the club launched a counter-claim relating to the cost of employing successor Gianfranco Zola and assistant Steve Clarke. The counterclaim was unsuccessful.

Richard Bevan, chief executive of the League Managers’ Association, said the outcome demonstrated the need for clubs to respect contracts.

Bevan said: ‘‘The findings of the tribunal demonstrate the critical importance of respecting contracts which need to set out the roles and responsibilities of the parties in clear terms.’’