I THINK Des More (HAS, June 4) concedes the point that it could not achieve anything if I had written to David Cameron rather than Gordon Brown suggesting the dissolution of Parliament.
The Queen’s constitutional position is that she must act in a non-party political manner. Even if she privately agreed to whatever Mr Cameron may have written, she would not have been able to act on the basis of his approach.
Mr More also says I had missed an important point about the Conservative reaction to the Government’s actions when it had to act to prevent the banking crisis getting any worse. I do not intentionally misrepresent what the Conservative leader says in the House of Commons.
When the General Election comes, and even before it, the Conservatives will have the opportunity to tell us what needs to be done. If they have already suggested a coherent way forward I am guilty of not noticing it, though I thought I had given it the whole of my attention.
I hold to the view that the Government had to act, and the Prime Minister was right to seek international co-ordination for measures to address the crisis. It will have an influence on how I decide to vote when the General Election comes.
Geoffrey Bulmer, Billingham.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here