LETTING Afghan interpreters and their relatives settle here (Echo, May 4) may be a gesture of appreciation for the help they have given us.
But up to now we’ve been given the impression that we were there helping them.
It may be because they are at risk in their own country, which would suggest that the project to impose a secure Western-style democracy was misconceived.
Perhaps we have kept soldiers in Afghanistan only because successive leaders didn’t want the failure of our invasion to be acknowledged on their watch.
Afghanistan has a future free from Taliban rule if and only if Afghans, like these interpreters, are prepared to fight for it. If the Taliban win, those who deserve asylum will already be dead.
The effect on our population, at a cost of many billions of pounds, will have been to replace several hundred young Britons by a similar number of foreigners. So it has at least been consistent with the rest of Government policy over the period.
JG Riseley Harrogate
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here