A woman who previously labelled people 'benefits scum' on Facebook will stand for election
The Darlington Green Party has defended its decision to allow Sue Morley to stand in the upcoming local election despite previously being blocked by another party due to the historic social media post.
Ms Morley is due to stand as a candidate in the Eastbourne ward in next month’s Darlington Borough Council elections.
The Green candidate was previously in line to represent the Labour Party in 2019’s election but was blocked from standing after she referred to “benefits scum” in social media posts.
In a Facebook post in 2014, Morley could be seen referring to a disabled person as “benefits scum” and referring to the area she hoped to represent as a “s***house” estate in a post about dog fouling in the area.
The local Labour Party investigated after being made aware of the comments in 2018 and told Morley she could not appear on the ballot paper. In response, she said she didn’t blame Labour for its decision – but believed the posts weren’t a fair reflection of what she said on social media.
"I have always been proud of where I am from and will always fight to do my best for the area whether I am a councillor or not,” Morley added at the time.
And when contacted by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Darlington Green Party defended one of its three candidates for the Eastbourne ward.
Read next:
- Plans for 22 'affordable' homes on site of former North East pub under the spotlight
- Councillor blasts ‘shocking’ treatment of residents after closure of Post Office
- How the tragic deaths of North East stabbing victims could shape knife crime policy
A spokesman said: “This is evidence of a growing concern by rivals in every Darlington ward that the Green Party is poised to make significant gains on election day.
“To be clear, Sue Morley, having switched from Labour, is totally committed to the ethics and standards of Darlington Green Party. These include civility, honesty and engaging in political debate without muck-raking, distortion and innuendo.
“It’s unnecessary for us to comment on two, nine-year-old, two-word phrases, presented to the readers four years ago and to us now with zero context despite our request for the full quotes. No evidence has been presented of any wrongdoing by our candidate.
"Nor can we comment on the reasons for another party deciding to change candidates.
“The Green Party is a nurturing organisation and does not contribute to unproven, damaging, distressing and probably defamatory slurs on its supporters or anyone else.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel