A GOVERNMENT inspector has ruled that the controversial development of a caravan park in a secluded valley should be allowed to go ahead.
The ruling in favour of builder George Armstrong's plan to create a 74-pitch caravan site at Thieves Gill at Tunstall, near Catterick, brings a long-running saga to an end.
Inspector Alan Novitzky's decision comes after months of protest about the development from local residents, environmental groups and parish councillors.
The proposals, rejected by Richmondshire District Council, provoked a storm of protest after claims they would threaten wildlife and have a detrimental effect on the countryside. English Nature, the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, Tunstall Parish Council and the Yorkshire Naturalists Union all objected to the plans.
Mr Armstrong appealed against the council's refusal of planning permission and took the issue to a public inquiry, where inspector Chris Frost approved the bid.
But that decision was quashed in the High Court, leading to another inquiry.
In his finding, Mr Novitzky said: "I have taken into account all other matters raised but they do not outweigh the considerations which led to my overall conclusions."
He said the development's scale 'in relation to the surrounding landscape would be no larger than that of the many sites recently granted planning permission for extended capacity.'
He added: "The population of the proposed caravan site, when full, might exceed that of Tunstall. However, it would be physically detached from all the surroundings settlements and, apart from being one option amongst others for drinking, there appears to be no reason for caravanners to be attracted to Tunstall.
"The main venue would be Catterick Camp and Colburn which, in my view, would be well able to absorb those attracted from the proposed caravan site without harm.
"I consider the proposal to be small scale in relation to the ability of local settlements to absorb the activity generated.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article