RESIDENTS on a Consett estate are again preparing to fight controversial housing plans after losing out in a similar row two years ago.
Miller Homes is putting the finishing touches to a 78-home development on the site of the town's former steelworks.
The houses were given planning permission two years ago despite fierce opposition from some residents on the nearby Grove estate.
It has now emerged that plans have been submitted for a further 44 houses on the same development, which, many residents claim, could disturb toxic chemicals buried under the former steelworks site.
They say that pockets of underground poisons, including dangerous lead and zinc, could ultimately be released into the water supply if buried slag is disturbed any further by building work.
Members of the Grove Action Group say that, like the initial development, this latest one will also cause traffic problems and a loss of wildlife in the nearby Derwent Valley.
Group secretary John Manwaring said: "People in this community are outraged they want to build another 44 houses. The initial district plan stated that only 60 houses could be built on this site so we want to know why they've submitted plans for more.
"Our biggest problem is that the expansion plans are just a few yards away from an area of high toxicity.
"We are asking for a full survey to be carried out to identify any risk from pollutants to potential homebuyers. Old slag heaps are the cause of pollution and who will be responsible if it leaches into the new homes?
"The new houses would also cause a significant increase in traffic along existing narrow roads, especially along Pemberton Road, Consett Lane and Priestman Avenue."
Peter Reynolds, head of planning services at Derwentside District Council, confirmed they had received a detailed planning application for eight semi-detached and 36 detached houses from Miller Homes.
He said: "This site is not specifically identified in our district plan, but that in itself does not preclude the development.
"It is far too early to say whether or not we will be requesting another site survey, but we will be contacting Durham County Council to see if the existing roads have the capacity for this development.
"We want to make sure that people know exactly what these plans include."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article