A RESIDENTS' group is urging a council to scrap plans for housing after a planning inspector advised against it.
As part of an inquiry into the Local Plan, Government planning inspector John Sheppard looked closely at proposals for 149 homes on green space near Broom Lane in Ushaw Moor.
The scheme, which has already won planning permission from Durham City Council, is being led by the Durham Villages Regeneration Company - a partnership between the council and Doncaster developer Keepmoat.
According to the council, it would breathe new life into Ushaw Moor and nearby villages by attracting private investment.
But the scheme has attracted opposition from local residents, who attempted unsuccessfully to block it by securing village green status for the site. Their arguments have been echoed by Mr Sheppard.
His report states: "There is no demonstrable need for this amount of additional housing.
"The need for regeneration in North West Durham is indeed great. However, I am not convinced that in itself the addition of new housing in such numbers to a single village would be wholly beneficial to other nearby villages, or that even this potential number of additional inhabitants would be sufficient to secure the future of existing shops or services."
Mr Sheppard also joins residents in expressing concern over the loss of the recreation area, and recommends that the council scraps the plans.
Dr Douglas Pocock, secretary of the City of Durham Trust which has opposed the development, said that although the council could reject Mr Sheppard's advice, he hoped it would not.
Durham City Council was unavailable for comment on the report.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article