A HEARING to determine whether detectives can permanently hold £500,000 confiscated from George Reynolds' car was adjourned yesterday.
The former Quakers chairman attended Newton Aycliffe Magistrates' Court, in County Durham, with his legal team to contest an application for a forfeiture order by detectives from the North-East's Regional Asset Recovery Team.
The civil proceedings were adjourned until October 27 by District Judge Michael Wood, despite objections from Mr Reynolds' barrister, Tim Roberts. "We were ready to have this matter determined last week," he said.
Police applied for the order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 last Wednesday - a month after magistrates said they could keep the cash for 28 days. The money will now remain with detectives, who suspect it was laundered from Darlington Football Club, until the two-day hearing in October.
The burden of proof will be on them to show they have reasonable grounds to suspect the cash is the proceeds of, or intended for, use in crime.
Mr Reynolds, his cousin Richard Tennick and personal assistant Ian Robinson were arrested on suspicion of money laundering after police swooped on the car in High Etherley, County Durham, on June 14.
He insists the cash, which he says was stored in a designer Louis Vuitton bag, was from the sale of his house, Witton Hall, at Witton-le-Wear, to the Sterling Consortium, the new owner of Darlington FC.
Mr Reynolds said outside court: "We have done nothing wrong. They were given 28 days and they have come up with nothing.
"I think it's very unfair. It's a case of victimisation."
The 67-year-old, once ranked 112th in the Sunday Times Rich List with a fortune of £260m, said he was not worried about police keeping the cash until October, but admitted: "I am not worth a lot now. I wouldn't say I was a multi-millionaire."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article