23/10/04

The basic idea which our Government is acting upon was a ploy put forward by Romano Prodi, former President of the EU. His idea was to make it easier for him to subsume the nations of Europe in order to ease the way towards a single federal state.

Our constitution was altered to grant devolution for Scotland and also Northern Ireland, I believe. Wales was given only an assembly and England nothing.

This is not acceptable to those not granted devolution and sooner rather than later the English will demand a fairer constitution. Unless there is a level playing field friction will occur.

To divide England into nine regions, each competing with the other and at the same time not having the powers of devolution like Scotland, will just further exacerbate the issue.

A vote for Yes will stir up resentment and must be stopped. - TE Gray, Brompton, Northallerton.

WE can have an assembly of people with love of the region and a burning desire to improve its image and the livelihood of its people. That is the main power our assembly needs and can have. Government departments prefer a quiet life. They won't get it if we elect men and women with fire in their bellies.

John Prescott did not invent the idea of a North-East assembly, the Government reluctantly yielded to pressure for a referendum from individuals in this region lobbying for a common cause following Scottish devolution.

We realised that as far as Whitehall is concerned we are as far away as Scotland. We have to get our act together or be disadvantaged by our northern neighbours.

The No campaign claims that the assembly will have no powers but will require a building as expensive as the Scottish Parliament. This deliberately distorts what is on offer to the North-East and suggests a lack of really sound points of opposition.

The motives of those taking an non-constructive approach are not obvious but they are unacceptable if it is something to do with party politics. Vote Prescott out if you want to but let us have our assembly.

It is important to vote yes in the referendum but our obligations will not end there. In the subsequent election we must resist place-seekers whose only claim to office is previous experience as MPs, MEPs or councillors. Regional government is a fresh challenge. The Yes campaigners are not seeking a home for tired carthorses. - Eric Shuttleworth, Darlington.

WITH only a short while remaining before the referendum vote, interest in the assembly seems to be at its height.

Considering the television debate, I thought the Yes campaigners made their point very well and seemed to have the stronger case.

Less convincing is the No campaign who are dismissing the assembly out of hand with nothing being suggested in its place.

I find the idea of the region being given the chance to run its own affairs very attractive and one that should not be missed. - LD Wilson, Guisborough.

ON November 4, the people of our region will vote on whether an elected regional assembly should be set up.

But the problem is we do not know what we are really voting for as the Government has only set out a draft Bill on what a regional assembly would do. That means in effect that the Bill is only a list of proposals that has not yet been agreed by Parliament, so it may change later.

That is not good enough. Why on earth should people vote on something that can actually change at a later date?

The Socialist Labour Party therefore believes that under these current proposals this will in fact be a very small insignificant regional committee with no real powers to make a difference to people's lives here in the North-East.

We therefore say No to a regional committee but Yes to a democratic local assembly that has real powers to make decisions in our area. - John Taylor, Redcar.

THE Teesside area has had a number of reorganisations in the past 25 years.

From being independent, boroughs were brought under the umbrella of a new authority, Teesside. Later Teesside was abolished. A fourth borough was incorporated, and Cleveland County was created. Later Cleveland was abolished. The four boroughs became unitary authorities. Back where they started.

For each change, great savings and greater efficiencies were promised. The actual result was rapid increases in council taxes, until they are among the highest in the country.

The proposals will make all the North-East unitary authorities subservient in a two-tier system. It is inevitable that taxes will increase in these areas. Proposed council changes in Durham and Northumberland will take local government further from the people.

No government has ever voluntarily passed its power or authority to other bodies. It is inconceivable that this Government would do so.

The proposals are only in a draft Bill and may be changed in Parliament, without reference to those being asked to vote. We are asked to vote for a pig in a poke. One which will, after the first year, prove very expensive. - F Jarvis, Redcar.

I WAS interested in the statement by John Tomaney from the Yes campaign, in the BBC TV debate, that "the regional assembly would on day one provide a free bus pass for pensioners".

In Tyne and Wear we have concessionary fares for pensioners. This year it is estimated that the Passenger Transport Authority will make a loss of over £45m, which has to be paid for by the council tax payers in Tyne and Wear.

The Government has said that there is no additional money for a regional assembly, so if they were to provide free bus passes across the region, the substantial costs would have to be paid by the same council tax payers.

There is no mention in the Government White Paper or in the Bill about free bus fares for pensioners, not has it been mentioned by any of the ministers who have visited the region.

I think that this is just a last minute attempt to persuade pensioners to vote Yes, believing this to be a fact. I think that John Tomaney underestimates the intelligence of our pensioners. - Ken Walls, South Shields.