IT was always going to be an announcement which would divide the nation.

To some, the idea of Charles marrying Camilla is offensive, largely because of the lasting affection for Princess Diana. To others, it is a cause of celebration. And, of course, there are those who simply don't care.

Our view is that it is time to move on and let the couple formalise their relationship, even though we recognise that process will be fraught with difficulties.

At least there has been careful consideration about the way it should be done in order to minimise the inevitable controversy.

Most importantly, the title, Princess of Wales, has rightly been avoided to dampen opposition from those who will always blame Camilla for ending Charles's marriage to Diana.

The idea that Camilla would one day be called Queen would also have been unpalatable to many, so that has been neatly side-stepped through the use of the title, Princess Consort.

As Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Charles could not marry a divorcee so Windsor Castle, which carries no religious significance, has been chosen as the setting for the civil ceremony.

And while critics will accuse Charles of hypocrisy, his marriage to Camilla is not in breach of any existing law.

Yesterday's announcement was made with a very necessary degree of compromise designed to defuse a highly sensitive situation.

That, at least, has to be applauded and we wish the couple well.