FRANCE has been the foundation in the construction of post-war Europe. It set out the original vision and has been pulling the strings ever since.
Its rejection of the EU constitution, therefore, leaves a fault line at the core of the European Union.
Although widely predicted, the scale of the "non" vote is a devastating blow for the supporters of the constitution.
Of course, there were many ingredients in the mix: dissatisfaction with the French government; a perceived reduction of France's influence in the enlarged Union; and concerns over the possible future membership of Turkey to name just a few.
But despite straw-clutching suggestions by people such as EU commissioner Peter Mandelson that the French could still hold a fresh referendum on a revised constitution, it is hard to see how new life could be breathed into this particular dead duck.
Tony Blair does not have to make a hasty decision on whether a British referendum should go ahead, predictably calling for a period of reflection.
But with Holland expected to deliver a similarly emphatic "no" vote tomorrow, opposition to the constitution is likely to gather such momentum that there will be very little point in Britain bothering to ask its people for a decision.
It all leaves the future of the EU looking very uncertain indeed and, with Britain taking over the EU presidency from July 1, Tony Blair is facing a hugely difficult task to pick up the pieces of a shattering verdict by our French neighbours.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article