A Newcastle woman is one of three people on trial after a pro-Palestine protest at Sir Keir Starmer's family home.
Sir Keir's wife Victoria told a court she felt “a bit sick” when she encountered the pro-Palestine demonstration outside their family home.
Victoria Starmer drove away in her car when she realised “people who were not agreeing with my husband” had gathered outside.
Zosia Lewis, 23, of Newcastle, Leonorah Ward, 21, of Leeds, and Daniel Formentin, 24, also of Leeds, are on trial at Westminster Magistrates’ Court over the demonstration, charged with public order offences under Section 42 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 and with breaching court bail. All three deny the charges.
Activists from the group Youth Demand hung a banner outside the London house that read: “Starmer stop the killing”, surrounded by red hand prints, while rows of children’s shoes were laid in front of the door on April 9, it is alleged.
Giving evidence at the trial in person, Lady Starmer said: “I felt a bit sick, to be perfectly honest.
“I felt apprehensive and uncomfortable.”
Lady Starmer had just returned from a shopping trip with her son when they spotted the protesters, the court heard.
She drove around the corner before contacting Sir Keir’s office because she “didn’t want to stop and be obvious”, she told the court.
Asked by Andrew Morris, defending, if she knew it was a “peaceful protest”, Lady Starmer said: “It would look like a peaceful protest if it hadn’t been outside my home.”
Put to her by Laura O’Brien, representing Ward, that she did not want the added publicity from the demonstration, she said: “That was absolutely not in my mind.”
Formentin, representing himself, told the court: “I firmly believe that Keir Starmer is not accurately representing the country.
“There is an overwhelming sense that young people in this country do want a ceasefire in Palestine.”
Formentin said the protesters took “as many steps as we could to mitigate any threat”, and had no plans to confront anyone.
Put to him by Mr Hallam that they still would have been intimidating and threatening, Formentin said: “No.”
Put to them that they never contemplated how someone living in the house might find the protest distressing, he said: “I think it could be seen as distressing.”
Metropolitan Police Sergeant Mark Upsdale, who arrived at the scene at around 2pm and made the order for the arrests, also gave evidence at the trial.
Asked by prosecutor Jacob Hallam KC if the protesters were making their intentions known to the officers, he said: “They said there was a plan but ‘we are not willing to tell you’, or something to that effect.”
Sgt Upsdale said holding the protest outside somebody’s house, instead of outside the House of Commons or Sir Keir’s offices, was “inappropriate”.
He added: “I did not know if they were going to be there 10 minutes or a day.”
The court was shown footage shared on social media of the demonstration, which included clips of the three defendants speaking, and police body-worn footage of the protesters being arrested by officers outside the home.
Section 42 powers cover the harassment of a person at their home address if an officer suspects it is causing alarm or distress to the occupant.
Recommended reading:
- Tribute paid to 'beloved' grandad who died in crash near County Durham village
- House explosion: Man fighting for life in hospital after home torn apart
- How heroic pupils helped classmates to safety seconds before fireball engulfs bus
Get more from The Northern Echo with a digital subscription. Get access for 4 months for just £4, or get 40% off an annual subscription with our latest offer. Click here.
Youth Demand describes itself as a “new youth resistance campaign fighting for an end to genocide”.
Children’s shoes have been used at a number of pro-Palestine demonstrations to signify the children killed in Gaza.
The same group sprayed Labour HQ with red paint, and later claimed that 11 people had been arrested in relation to that incident.
The three deny the charges, and the trial continues.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel