Labour will pledge to renationalise the railways if elected, in what the party will call the “biggest overhaul to our railways in a generation”.
A Labour government would expect to transfer rail networks to public ownership within its first term by folding existing private passenger rail contracts into a new body as they expire, shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh will say at a launch event tomorrow (Thursday, April 25).
The plan will nationalise the network “without the taxpayer paying a penny in compensation costs”, the party will say.
The Government’s own proposals for rail reform, published in a draft Bill in February, include the creation of a new public sector body named Great British Railways (GBR) to hold responsibility for rail infrastructure and awarding contracts to operate trains.
But a Labour government would create a “unified, publicly owned, accountable and arm’s length” version of GBR led by rail experts rather than Whitehall, Ms Haigh will say.
Labour also plans to establish a watchdog, the Passenger Standards Authority, to hold GBR to account.
Ms Haigh will say: “With Labour’s bold reforms, a publicly owned railway will be single-mindedly focused on delivering for passengers and will be held to account on delivering reliable, safe, efficient, accessible, affordable and quality services.
“Labour’s detailed plans will get our railways back on track; driving up standards for passengers, bringing down costs for taxpayers, driving growth and getting Britain moving.”
The Government estimated in its 2021 reform plan that it could save £1.5 billion annually after five years by ending inefficiency and fragmentation.
Labour says, citing its own analysis, that transitioning to public ownership could save money by cutting out franchise bidding costs, reducing the duplication of resources and lessening friction between operators.
The party also plans to bring in automatic delay and cancellation refunds, make digital season tickets available on all networks, and make timetables, tickets and fares more integrated. It also proposes moving mobile service on trains towards 5G and improving the integration of rail travel with bus and cycle hire services.
The Government’s reform plans were based on recommendations from a review carried out by former British Airways chief executive Keith Williams.
Mr Williams said of Labour’s plans: “I welcome Labour’s intention, if they are elected, to take forward the substance of my recommendations to deliver a better railway for passengers and freight by creating a rail body with an integrated profit and loss account, at arm’s length from government.”
Mick Whelan, general secretary of Aslef, said: “We have seen more positivity in this stunning Labour Party vision for rail than anything at any time from the Tories during their failed privatisation and subsequent incoherent rail reform programme.
“The Labour commitment delivers for the economy, for the taxpayer, for passengers, and for staff.”
Recommended reading:
- EXCLUSIVE | Steve Gibson accuses Ben Houchen of 'giving away children's future' in Teesworks deal
- 'Absolutely shocking': Concern over quality of school meals in County Durham schools
- Durham woman's pain after brother's suicide in jail 17 YEARS into 23-month sentence
Get more from The Northern Echo with a digital subscription. Get access for 5 months for just £5, or get 40% off an annual subscription with our latest offer. Click here.
Mick Lynch, general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union said: “Labour’s commitment to bring the train operating companies into a new unified and publicly owned rail network is in the best interests of railway workers, passengers and the taxpayer.”
He added: “This announcement however should be a first step to completely integrating all of our railway into public ownership.”
Andy Bagnall, chief executive at Rail Partners, an industry group of train operators and freight groups, said: “Train companies agree that change is needed for the railways, but nationalisation is a political rather than a practical solution which will increase costs over time.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel