NUFC co-owner Amanda Staveley faces £3.4m bill after court battle

Ms Staveley had been issued with a bankruptcy petition by businessman Victor Restis, who claimed she was liable to pay him £3.4 million owed from an investment he made in her business ventures.

The businesswoman, part of NUFC's ownership who masterminded the 2021 takeover of the club, had applied to the High Court to throw out Mr Restis’ application, with her lawyers telling a hearing earlier in March that she had “substantial ground for denying liability” and the dispute should be settled out of court.

In a judgment on Monday, Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Daniel Schaffer dismissed her bid, ruling the dispute should be dealt with in court and that Ms Staveley was liable to pay the sum.

Reading out his judgment at London’s Rolls Building, he said: “The demand totalling £3.4 million is sound.”

Amanda Staveley. (Image: PA)

Mr Restis has until April 22 to issue a bankruptcy petition following the decision, unless Ms Staveley pays the money owed before that date.

Ted Loveday, representing Ms Staveley, previously told the court in written submissions that it was “common ground” that Mr Restis had made a £10 million investment in Ms Staveley’s business ventures in 2008.

He said there was “plainly a degree of ambiguity about whether this was a loan or some other form of investment”.

Mr Restis initially issued a statutory demand in May 2023 for a total of £36.8 million, which included the outstanding loan sum of £3.4 million and “exorbitant” interest of £31.3 million, Mr Loveday said.

The tycoon’s barristers later dropped their claims for the interest and legal costs, instead claiming only the loan’s outstanding balance.

Newcastle owner Amanda Staveley (left) and husband Mehrdad Ghodoussi in the stands before the Premier League match at Stamford Bridge, London. (Image: PA)

Mr Loveday said the parties entered an agreement in May 2016 where they agreed to submit their disputes to arbitration, that Ms Staveley was not personally liable and that her company PCP Capital Partners would pay.

But the lawyer said his client was told to sign other documents between 2017 and 2021 which ultimately said Ms Staveley was personally liable and incrementally topped up the liability.

He claimed that these “instruments” were “procured by duress, undue influence and/or misrepresentation”, and that Ms Staveley felt intimidated into signing them.

However, the judge said Ms Staveley’s liability was “proved conclusively” in the documents and that it “beggars belief” she did not understand she was liable, adding the claim “ventures into the realm of fantasy and is completely implausible”.

The judge also said there was “no evidence” that Ms Staveley was under duress from Mr Restis or his lawyers.

He said: “There were clearly commercial pressures on Ms Staveley, but Mr Restis was perfectly entitled to press for payment.”

“Was there any illegitimate pressure? In my judgment, on the facts of this case, no,” he continued.

He said messages between the pair indicated a “warm business relationship” which “cannot be construed in any way, fashion or form to support a claim of unlawful distress”.

In her written arguments, Raquel Agnello KC, representing Mr Restis, said Ms Staveley was sent documents, given time to look over them and given opportunities to make revisions before she signed them, including one in 2021 which superseded previous agreements and made Ms Staveley liable.

Ms Agnello told the court there was “a real lack of reality” in the claims of unlawful conduct and that Ms Staveley relied on “bare assertions” which were “inherently implausible”.

The judge also said Ms Staveley, who he described as an “astute businesswoman”, had “singularly failed” to show her judgment was unduly influenced by her diagnosis of Huntingdon’s disease when signing the documents.

Recommended reading:

• Van gets stuck in notorious Darlington tunnel as police on scene - updates
• Candle-lit vigil held for missing teenager after body recovered from Tees
• 'Impossible' to say how 22-year-old County Durham man missing for six weeks died

Get more from The Northern Echo with a digital subscription. Get access for 4 months for just £4, or get 40% off an annual subscription with our latest offer. Click here.

He deemed the claims, as well as those of being placed under duress, were “unsustainable” and had a “complete lack of credibility”.

Ms Staveley, who headed a Saudi-backed consortium that took over Newcastle United in 2021, did not attend court on Monday.

Following the decision, a spokesperson for her said: “Amanda Staveley notes the ruling of the High Court today on her application to have set aside a statutory demand brought by Victor Restis.

“Ms Staveley notes and welcomes that the ruling made a £33 million reduction in the claim to principal only with no interest.

“Nevertheless, Ms Staveley continues to dispute personal liability and intends to lodge an appeal.”