An inmate at a top security North East jail is to stand trial later this year accused of an attack on another prisoner using an improvised bladed weapon.
Daniel Service is alleged to have carried out the attack in the cell of another inmate at Frankland Prison, on the outskirts of Durham, on Saturday, January 7 this year.
He appeared at Durham Crown Court via video link from the prison at a plea hearing in the case today (Tuesday, August 1).
Following a brief conference with his counsel, Emma Fenn, prior to the hearing, the charge of wounding with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm on the other inmate was put to Service.
Read more: Dangerous offender admits attempted murder of fellow Frankland inmate
The 31-year-old defendant, from South Gloucestershire, pleaded not guilty.
He is accused of using the self-fashioned bladed weapon, on the other inmate in the incident, leaving the injured man covered with blood.
Asked by Judge James Adkin what would be the likely issue in the case, Miss Fenn said: “Self-defence and no intention to cause really serious injuries.
“There is no cctv footage of the incident from within the cell,” she added.
Judge Adkin adjourned the hearing for a trial, estimated to run for two days, to take place at the court later this year.
Read next:
Frankland inmate planned faeces attack on prison officer
HMP Frankland slash attack: Carlisle killer Jamie Davison jailed for longer
Prison officer attacked in HMP Frankland leaves him off work for a year
Get all the latest crime and court updates, for less than the price of a coffee, with a Premium Plus digital subscription to The Northern Echo. Click here
A suitable date was pinpointed for the trial, starting at the court on November 29.
As part of the pre-trial administration of evidence, the defence was instructed to provide its case in full to the court by October 10, four weeks after the submission of the prosecution evidence.
Judge Adkin asked prosecution counsel, Uzma Khan, for the Crown to ensure the complainant in the case is able to give evidence by video link from a remote site, thereby not requiring him to be brought to the court during the course of the trial.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article