A police force says it will have to spend more than £1million to maintain a former radio mast it wants to demolish, diverting funding away from  tackling crime and recruiting officers.

The Grade II-listed concrete tripod mast was installed outside Durham's Aykley Heads police headquarters in 1968, having been designed by the office of the celebrated Ove Arup, who engineered Sydney Opera House and Durham City’s own Kingsgate Bridge.

It was dismantled in 2017 to allow a housing development on the old HQ site, but it was a condition of the planning permission that the mast be retained and re-erected at Aykley Heads. The 49.4 metre structure has been laid down in a storage area and covered in tarpaulin next to the HQ ever since.

Read more: The Times reveals the 20 best North East schools - and one ranks 16th in the UK

Durham Constabulary applied to demolish the mast after calculating the cost of putting it back up would be £496,000, with maintenance estimated at £421,900, and an additional £56,600 for the erection of security fencing. Potentially re-erecting it at another site is not considered a viable option.

Building a warehouse to store the mast for future generations would cost a further £750,000 up front, plus £30,000 to £70,000 a year running costs, while burial would cost an estimated £460,000. Instead, demolition at a cost of about £223,800 was considered as a final option by Durham police.

The force said the paying for the mast would divert funding away from recruiting officers and tackling crime.

The Northern Echo: Durham police spent around £300,000 to dismantle the mast Durham police spent around £300,000 to dismantle the mast (Image: TOM BANKS)

The Northern Echo: The mast has covered since it was dismantled The mast has covered since it was dismantled (Image: The Northern Echo)

Gary Ridley, chief finance officer for Durham and Darlington Police and Crime Commissioner, told the meeting: “The PCC accepts its historical significance and the damage that would be done were it not to be re-erected. That said, the mast has no practical commercial, sentimental or operational value for the force.

“I would stress that there is very limited scope for more cash savings to be taken out of the force. This puts us in a very difficult position financially because we cannot sack police officers.

“I am deeply aware of the value that PCSO’s play in terms of community engagement but if we are forced to having to pay for the mast to be re-erected there is a real likelihood that we may be forced to suspend recruitment of PCSO’s for up to two years. This would undermine visible policing in our communities.”

However, the application was rejected by councillors at a county planning meeting on Tuesday.

Members said the structure is of historical and architectural significance given it was once a key part of the city’s landscape. Councillors also questioned why the capital funding received from the sale of the former HQ site had not been saved - but the force said it had been spent on officer recruitment and services.

Read more stories here:

If you want to read more great stories, why not subscribe to your Northern Echo for as little as £1.25 a week. Click here

Cllr Liz Brown said: “This is like someone knocking down Durham Cathedral. This is an iconic listed structure, until 2012 it was on the skyline. I think the police are being disingenuous by saying: ‘oh we can’t afford it now’. The money should have been earmarked to do this.”

The Northern Echo: The County Police Communications Tower being built, on July 6, 1968. It was described as a beautiful Brutalist sculpture, and the police were so proud of it that when (then) Prince Charles visited in 1978, he was given a silver model of it.The County Police Communications Tower being built, on July 6, 1968. It was described as a beautiful Brutalist sculpture, and the police were so proud of it that when (then) Prince Charles visited in 1978, he was given a silver model of it. (Image: The Northern Echo)

Cllr Kevin Shaw was one of only two members who voted for a deferment to the application. “The financial impact on Durham Constabulary does outweigh any benefit of resighting the mast. We should have further dialogue with them,” he said.

It is not yet known if the force will appeal the council’s refusal to demolish the mast.

A spokesman for Durham Constabulary said: “The force will be working closely with the Police and Crime Commissioner to work through the implications of this decision in terms of service delivery and the broader impact on the public.”