A SEX offender who has persistently flouted notification requirements whenever released from prison is back behind bars for his latest breaches.
Jack Whitfield-Gash, then aged 20, was jailed for 16 months at Durham Crown Court in August 2017, after being convicted of sexual activity with a child under 16, an offence committed when he was said to be an 18-year-old.
He was also made subject of a five-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) and required to register as a sex offender for ten years, but committed his first breach shortly after his release, receiving an initial ten-day sentence.
Whitfield-Gash was back before magistrates in Newton Aycliffe, in early March, and committed back to the crown court for sentence, having admitted two offences of failing to comply with notification requirements and three of failing to comply with a SHPO.
The court was told he failed to inform police he was living at the home of a woman who has a young daughter, days after being released from Durham Prison, on January 18 this year.
Durham Crown Court heard that he also chatted with two underage teenage girls at a bus stop, at which he told them he was “stoned”, and exchanged phone numbers with one, later receiving a message from her asking if he was, “still stoned?”
Tabitha Buck, prosecuting, said his phone was seized after he left an address on February 28 and examination revealed contact with the girls, at a bus stop in Durham.
The parents of the girl who sent the message to Whitfield-Gash were unaware their daughter had been in communication with him.
When interviewed about the various breaches, Whitfield-Gash described the situation as, “one big game”, adding that it was, “stupid little things that police keep getting him on.”
Miss Buck told the court the defendant became agitated with the interviewing officer and threatened to spit at her.
Read more: Sex offender breached registration conditions
Whitfield-Gash, 24, of no fixed address, but who has been in custody in Durham Prison since his latest arrest, in late February, was said to have 30 convictions for 50 offences, including 13 sex-related, 11 of them being previous failures to comply with notification requirements.
Miss Buck told the court that the defendant, “has links all over the North East”, and she said the latest batch of offences suggested it was, “a deliberate attempt to avoid detection”, as he is fully aware of the requirements of the orders, given his recent offending history.
Jane Waugh, in mitigation, said all the offences are committed as he is homeless, as those with whom he can make contact all live more than two hours by bus from any police station at which he must register his address.
She said there was no intention to evade police and, with the brief meeting with the girls at the bus stop, there was, “no sexual intention or motivation”.
Judge Ray Singh said he rejected Whitfield-Gash’s assertion to police that these were just, “trivial matters”.
“You, more than anyone else, know the serious nature of the orders against you
“Because you know about this, you have appeared before the courts for 11 previous breaches.
“This is not an isolated offence. These are deliberate, persistent, prolonged breaches over a number of years, not stating to police where you are living, making it hard to monitor your movements.
“I’m afraid the lessons are not sinking in over these matters.”
Imposing a two-year prison sentence Judge Singh said it would be for the police to apply, “through other channels” to extend the SHPO, which expires in August.
Keep up to date with all the latest news on our website, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
You can also follow our dedicated County Durham Facebook page for all the latest in the area by clicking here.
For all the top news updates from right across the region straight to your inbox, sign up to our newsletter here.
Have you got a story for us? Contact our newsdesk on newsdesk@nne.co.uk or contact 01325 505054
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel