THE director of a North East company has today been sentenced at Teesside Crown Court after pleading guilty to waste offences.

Andrew Mark Bainbridge, 52, of Harlsey Road, Stockton on Tees, was the Managing Director and sole shareowner of Stockton based Auckland Environmental Services Limited (AES) when it was investigated by the Environment Agency in 2016 for waste offences.

The company, now in liquidation, which operated from a site at 2 and 3 Bowsfield Lane, Stockton on Tees, Cleveland, was found to have engaged in criminal activity between June 2014 and February 2016, by mis-describing waste it deposited at landfill for significant financial gain.

The company was investigated by the Environment Agency after it was found to be storing waste materials on-site without an appropriate environmental permit. This included waste that the company had purposefully mis-described, allowing AES to dispose of the material at a lower rate of landfill tax.

For consenting to the unlawful deposits of waste by AES Ltd, Bainbridge received a 15-month custodial sentence suspended for two years.

For consenting to the making of false or misleading information by AES Ltd, he received a 12-month custodial sentence suspended for two years. The two sentences will run concurrently.

Bainbridge must also undertake 200 hours of unpaid work and perform a rehabilitation activity. He was disqualified from acting as a company director for six years.

The sentencing follows a Proceeds of Crime Act confiscation hearing on October 7, 2021, in which Bainbridge was handed a confiscation order for £806,786.79.

He was told to repay the total sum of his current assets which amounts to £275,833.16 by January 7, 2022, or risk a default custodial sentence of two and a half years.

The remainder of the confiscation order will remain as a debt against the director until it is satisfied.

Read more: Police officer gets the sack after sharing confidential information with family member

Environment Agency spokesperson John Crowl said: “The savings were substantial. Between December 2014 and February 2016 approximately 3,510 tonnes of waste were deposited at the landfill site at a cost £9,055 when it should have cost £288,085.

“Further, by operating without an environmental permit, Bainbridge, through the company, sought to avoid complying with operating conditions that were necessary to protect the public and the environment from harm.

"This represented a further financial advantage to the company and further undermined legitimate local waste operators and jobs.”

The court found that Bainbridge had committed the offending deliberately and there had been a major undermining of the regulatory regime as a result.

In mitigation, the court heard Mr Bainbridge had not committed any further offences, represented a low risk of re-offending and had caring responsibilities.

Both AES and Bainbridge have previous convictions for environmental offences committed in August/September 2013. In February 2015 the company and Bainbridge were convicted of operating without an environmental permit and fined £7,800 and £520 respectively.

Keep up to date with all the latest news on our website, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

You can also follow our dedicated Teesside Facebook page for all the latest in the area by clicking here.

For all the top news updates from right across the region straight to your inbox, sign up to our newsletter here.

Have you got a story for us? Contact our newsdesk on newsdesk@nne.co.uk or contact 01325 505054