Recently I visited an exhibition of modern art. Is digital photography responsible for the obscure interpretation of still life in paintings?
Now that cameras on our mobile phones coupled with photo-editing apps can help fumbling thumbs reproduce reality, painting has become a medium solely to demonstrate raw beauty and emotion.
To understand the meaning of some of these colourful works it is almost compulsory to browse with a gallery guide in hand.
If you actually want to experience the impact, you could do what many of the couples I followed round were doing: ignoring the guide and working out for themselves the effect and impact of some of the larger pieces.
Trouble is that art can be a very personal encounter that isn't always made for sharing.
Net result (or maybe it was just the effect of a miserable, wet Saturday) was disagreement.
Raised voices followed together with a hasty exit on my part to avoid embarrassment and the compulsion to hand out business cards, or, as in my last post, to usher the offending pairs to the tearoom.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article