COUNCILLORS have backed controversial plans to build 400 homes on the edge of a former pit village.
Objectors from Langley Park, near Durham, urged Durham County Council's county planning committee to knock back the outline development proposals lodged by Southlands Management.
But they followed officers' recommendations and today (Tuesday, June 4) granted approval after hearing the developers would include 80 affordable homes as part of the £40m scheme.
Dozens of people opposed the plans amid concerns that the site, currently fields, could flood.
Residents also fear that the influx of people to the housing development will put a strain on local facilities and increase traffic congestion.
People are also unhappy that an access road will have to cut into the Lanchester Valley Way, a popular old railway walk.
Richard Bowyer, of Esh Parish Council, said the development breached council planning policies as it was outside the village boundary.
He said the owners of the homes would probably work elsewhere and use retail parks in Durham for their shopping.
"I urge you, I beg you, to let democracy prevail. The people of Esh Parish have voiced their opinion. Do not approve this application."
Planning officer James Taylor said bodies such as Northumbria Water and the highways authority had not objected and that concerns about flooding had been addressed.
Neil Westwick, speaking on behalf of the developers, said benefits included the creation of 38 jobs during the ten-year construction phase and increased business for local traders.
He said the site was appropriate for development and would help meet an identified need.
Southlands will, at a later date, submit detailed plans for the homes, of three, four and five bedrooms.
Councillors also heard that the land is identified as a preferred housing site in the County Durham Plan, more houses are needed in the area and the development would create a high-quality inclusive and sustainable residential community.
Southlands would contribute £400,000 to help to revamp the village's Old Rec, £100,000 for public art and environmental work and £70,000 for community facilities.
Councillors welcomed the development, saying it would help regenerate the village
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel